Hmmm...!?! I have completed listening to 12 tutorial groups give me their presentations on the aging population in Singapore and unemployment or healthcare or retirement, i.e. about
60 Spies R Us groups in all!
Phew!!!
Let me share with you about my best groups and tell you what they did that was really great...Two Spies R Us groups in T70 were really outstanding!
JUDGERS chose to have one person represent their entire group. Their topic was THE AGING POPULATION AND RETIREMENT COSTS in the Singapore context. Their entire presentation was
well structured. They gave me the topic of their choice, clearly identified the issues/problems and then proceeded to give me their solutions. They did not ding dong between issues/problems and solutions which would be very confusing to the audience.
They chose a
confident speaker. He was not uum-ing or ah-ing. He spoke evenly and clearly throughout the presentation. They gave me two solutions only - well, they may have given more but I heard 2 of them clearly! :-) It may just be 2 solutions, but they really dealt with them in depth. I feel this is better than to give me 10 solutions and not explaining them clearly. This would only reveal your team's weaknesses during the Q & A part of the presentation.
Now for the other group,
GROUP 3. They chose THE AGING POPULATION AND UNEMPLOYMENT. They adopted a different strategy. They had EVERYONE play a part!. Is this better than having one person? Maybe. Maybe not! It depends. In this case they made the right decision. Why? Everyone had a
clear role/part to play.
The first speaker gave a good intro by informing us of the subject. Then she told us what each team member would be touching on. This gave me a
big picture of their presentation. I therefore knew where they started and where they wanted me to end as I followed their arguments. The passing of the presentation parts from one person to another was well done; there were no pauses and each person wasted no time in presenting their part. At the end of their part, they would hand off to the next speaker by explaining what the next person would cover. This was good in that it conveyed to me a sense of continuity in arguments. Another good thing was that they hit my mind and my heart - not literally, or I would be in hospital now writing this! :-) They 2nd speaker gave me the usual facts that I have heard countless times. Ho hum! You need to present the facts, and facts are facts! You can't really present these in very many forms.
BUT...they had a great strategy to catch my attention. The facts hit my head - the thinking part. But then their 3rd speaker told a story of an older person who had trouble finding a job - that hit my heart, the feeling/emotional side of me. Well done! The 4th speaker carried the team's argument further by presenting, again, facts! Ho hum! But again, that was necessary. However, he gave another example to show why his argument was important. He mentioned about the Singapore government's emphasis on the need to look forward and to lower expectations. Yes, yes, we hear that stuff all the time in the papers, and over the TV. One ear in and one ear out! But when the speaker used China as an example, it really drove home his point. If the Chinese in China, where the cost of production is still very much lower than ours, are looking forward and are willing to lower expectations so that they can at least have jobs, then we had better change and lower our expectations too! Otherwise we will be so expensive, no one would want to buy what we produce! I found that strategy of facts plus stories or appropriate examples very powerful. The last speaker did a good job in rounding off the arguments.
I hope you will read these last few posts because I know you guys can get very good grades for your Spies R Us presentations. Please do your best! You have nothing to lose but everything to gain!
As you meet in these last few days before your Spies R Us presentations, what are the things you can do to polish your presentations?
*Do a few dry runs.
*Time yourselves. You have 10 minutes.
*Get someone outside of your Spies R Us group to give comments.
*If there is a lot of umm-ing and ah-ing, it shows you are unclear of your part. Clarify it quickly.
*If you exceed your time, is the excess due to too many points or is it due to too many pauses, and wastage when passing from one person to the other?
*How do you decide whether to have 1 presenter or have everyone play a role?
Any other considerations?